On 07/15/2014 06:54 AM, Peter Hurley wrote: > > Jonathan Corbet wrote a LWN article about this back in 2012: > http://lwn.net/Articles/478657/ > > I guess it's fixed in gcc 4.8, but too bad there's not a workaround for > earlier compilers (akin to -fstrict_volatile_bitfields without requiring > the volatile keyword)
>From the gcc pr, it looks like the patch was backported to 4.7. But we didn't fix it in versions earlier than that. r~ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
