* Matt Mackall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Or do you want to do it the same way you do for every other branch? I > don't want to special-case it in my code and I don't think users want > to special-case it in their brains. Have separate interdiffs on the > side, please, and then people can choose, but do it the standard way. > > Dear ${SUCKER}s, can we have a decision on this? My ketchup tool is > broken for 2.6.11.2 and I don't want to cut a new release until a firm > decision is made. Obviously I have a strong preference for all 2.6.x.y > diffs being against 2.6.x, it means that .y can be treated the same as > -rc, -bk, -mm, ... (and I already coded it that way when 2.6.8.1 came > out).
I agree with having the patch be against .x, with x.y -> x.y+1 interdiffs available on the side. Greg, any issue with that? thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/