On 07/14/2014 12:05 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Simply unfold the code of start_worker() into create_worker() and
> remove the original start_worker() and create_and_start_worker().
> 
> The only trade-off is the introduced overhead that the pool->lock
> is released and re-grabbed after the newly worker is started.
> The overhead is acceptable since the manager is slow path.

Hi, TJ

Will you accept this trade-off and the patch?
If so, I will rebase this patch without any dependence on other patch.

Thanks,
Lai

> 
> And because this new locking behavior, the newly created worker
> may grab the lock earlier than the manager and go to process
> work items. In this case, the need_to_create_worker() may be
> true as expected and the manager goes to restart without complaint.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  kernel/workqueue.c |   69 
> ++++++++++------------------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 2b3c12c..5b68527 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1553,7 +1553,7 @@ static void worker_enter_idle(struct worker *worker)
>                        (worker->hentry.next || worker->hentry.pprev)))
>               return;
>  
> -     /* can't use worker_set_flags(), also called from start_worker() */
> +     /* can't use worker_set_flags(), also called from create_worker() */
>       worker->flags |= WORKER_IDLE;
>       pool->nr_idle++;
>       worker->last_active = jiffies;
> @@ -1674,8 +1674,7 @@ static void worker_detach_from_pool(struct worker 
> *worker,
>   * create_worker - create a new workqueue worker
>   * @pool: pool the new worker will belong to
>   *
> - * Create a new worker which is attached to @pool.  The new worker must be
> - * started by start_worker().
> + * Create and start a new worker which is attached to @pool.
>   *
>   * CONTEXT:
>   * Might sleep.  Does GFP_KERNEL allocations.
> @@ -1720,6 +1719,13 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool 
> *pool)
>       /* successful, attach the worker to the pool */
>       worker_attach_to_pool(worker, pool);
>  
> +     /* start the newly created worker */
> +     spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
> +     worker->pool->nr_workers++;
> +     worker_enter_idle(worker);
> +     wake_up_process(worker->task);
> +     spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
> +
>       return worker;
>  
>  fail:
> @@ -1730,44 +1736,6 @@ fail:
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * start_worker - start a newly created worker
> - * @worker: worker to start
> - *
> - * Make the pool aware of @worker and start it.
> - *
> - * CONTEXT:
> - * spin_lock_irq(pool->lock).
> - */
> -static void start_worker(struct worker *worker)
> -{
> -     worker->pool->nr_workers++;
> -     worker_enter_idle(worker);
> -     wake_up_process(worker->task);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * create_and_start_worker - create and start a worker for a pool
> - * @pool: the target pool
> - *
> - * Grab the managership of @pool and create and start a new worker for it.
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success. A negative error code otherwise.
> - */
> -static int create_and_start_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
> -{
> -     struct worker *worker;
> -
> -     worker = create_worker(pool);
> -     if (worker) {
> -             spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
> -             start_worker(worker);
> -             spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
> -     }
> -
> -     return worker ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> -}
> -
> -/**
>   * destroy_worker - destroy a workqueue worker
>   * @worker: worker to be destroyed
>   *
> @@ -1905,18 +1873,7 @@ restart:
>       mod_timer(&pool->mayday_timer, jiffies + MAYDAY_INITIAL_TIMEOUT);
>  
>       while (true) {
> -             struct worker *worker;
> -
> -             worker = create_worker(pool);
> -             if (worker) {
> -                     spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
> -                     start_worker(worker);
> -                     if (WARN_ON_ONCE(need_to_create_worker(pool)))
> -                             goto restart;
> -                     return true;
> -             }
> -
> -             if (!need_to_create_worker(pool))
> +             if (create_worker(pool) || !need_to_create_worker(pool))
>                       break;
>  
>               schedule_timeout_interruptible(CREATE_COOLDOWN);
> @@ -3543,7 +3500,7 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const 
> struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
>               goto fail;
>  
>       /* create and start the initial worker */
> -     if (create_and_start_worker(pool) < 0)
> +     if (!create_worker(pool))
>               goto fail;
>  
>       /* install */
> @@ -4617,7 +4574,7 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct 
> notifier_block *nfb,
>               for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
>                       if (pool->nr_workers)
>                               continue;
> -                     if (create_and_start_worker(pool) < 0)
> +                     if (!create_worker(pool))
>                               return NOTIFY_BAD;
>               }
>               break;
> @@ -4917,7 +4874,7 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
>  
>               for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
>                       pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
> -                     BUG_ON(create_and_start_worker(pool) < 0);
> +                     BUG_ON(!create_worker(pool));
>               }
>       }
>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to