On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: >> In seccomp_prepare_user_filter, would it make sense to return -EINVAL >> if !user_filter? That will make it slightly more pleasant to >> implement TSYNC-without-change if anyone ever wants it. (This isn't >> really necessary -- it's just slightly more polite.) > > I can't do this since EFAULT is already used to detect seccomp > capabilities from userspace.
Aha. In that case, can you (separately) send a prctl.2 manpage patch documenting that? Also, I'm pretty sure you can get away with doing this for seccomp(2) -- EINVAL and ENOSYS are easily distinguishable, but the current behavior is IMO also fine if documented. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
