We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine <[email protected]> --- Tested by compilation without errors. drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c index d3b967a..4a90cda 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ struct smsc9420_pdata { int last_carrier; }; -static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(smsc9420_id_table) = { +static const struct pci_device_id smsc9420_id_table[] = { { PCI_VENDOR_ID_9420, PCI_DEVICE_ID_9420, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, }, { 0, } }; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
