We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine <[email protected]> --- Tested by compilation without errors. drivers/block/rsxx/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c b/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c index a8de2ee..820b400 100644 --- a/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c +++ b/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c @@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ static const struct pci_error_handlers rsxx_err_handler = { .slot_reset = rsxx_slot_reset, }; -static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(rsxx_pci_ids) = { +static const struct pci_device_id rsxx_pci_ids[] = { {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_FS70_FLASH)}, {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_FS80_FLASH)}, {0,}, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
