We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet
kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.

Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine <[email protected]>

---
Not tested.

 drivers/net/ethernet/pasemi/pasemi_mac.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pasemi/pasemi_mac.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/pasemi/pasemi_mac.c
index 9abf70d7..30d934d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pasemi/pasemi_mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pasemi/pasemi_mac.c
@@ -1871,7 +1871,7 @@ static void pasemi_mac_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
        free_netdev(netdev);
 }
 
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(pasemi_mac_pci_tbl) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id pasemi_mac_pci_tbl[] = {
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_PASEMI, 0xa005) },
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_PASEMI, 0xa006) },
        { },

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to