We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine <[email protected]> --- Tested by compilation without errors. drivers/net/ethernet/adaptec/starfire.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/adaptec/starfire.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/adaptec/starfire.c index 40dbbf7..ac72882 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/adaptec/starfire.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/adaptec/starfire.c @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ enum chipset { CH_6915 = 0, }; -static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(starfire_pci_tbl) = { +static const struct pci_device_id starfire_pci_tbl[] = { { PCI_VDEVICE(ADAPTEC, 0x6915), CH_6915 }, { 0, } }; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
