4badad35 (locking/mutex: Disable optimistic spinning on some
architectures) added a ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW flag to
disable the mutex optimistic feature on specific archs.

Because CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER only depended on DEBUG and
SMP, it was ok to have the ->owner field conditional a bit
flexible. However by adding a new variable to the matter,
we can waste space with the unused field, ie: CONFIG_SMP &&
(!CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER && !CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEX).

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidl...@hp.com>
---
 include/linux/mutex.h  | 2 +-
 kernel/locking/mutex.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
index 8d5535c..e4c2941 100644
--- a/include/linux/mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct mutex {
        atomic_t                count;
        spinlock_t              wait_lock;
        struct list_head        wait_list;
-#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES) || defined(CONFIG_SMP)
+#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES) || defined(CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER)
        struct task_struct      *owner;
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.h b/kernel/locking/mutex.h
index 4115fbf..5cda397 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 #define mutex_remove_waiter(lock, waiter, ti) \
                __list_del((waiter)->list.prev, (waiter)->list.next)
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
 static inline void mutex_set_owner(struct mutex *lock)
 {
        lock->owner = current;
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to