On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 7:28 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 2014-07-30 15:09, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 03:04:03PM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
>>> On 2014-07-30 14:41, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:53:47PM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <[email protected]>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v2: Be less aggressive in brace removal.  Keep them for outer nested
>>>>> 'if's.  Keep them in outer control statements where the inner control
>>>>> statement uses braces.
>>>>
>>>> Really every multi-line indent should have braces for readability.  This
>>>> isn't documented anywhere, but it's normal kernel style and Greg prefers
>>>> it for staging as well but I can't find the URL on google where he
>>>> mentioned that.
>>>
>>> With this version of the patch, amplc_pci230.c conforms to that --
>>> as long as you don't count comments, or splitting a simple statement
>>> across multiple lines to fit within 80 columns, e.g.:
>>>
>>>                     if (foo)
>>>                             /* do this */
>>>                             bar = baz +
>>>                                   qux;
>>
>> Heh...  I am counting comments and broken lines, though.  It's not a
>> totally strict rule and it's especially not strict for broken lines.
>> But we would prefer braces in those situations.
>
> If necessary, patches 13 and 19 can be dropped entirely.

That might be best for now.

The rest of the series applies fine with them dropped.

Regards,
Hartley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to