On 07/31/2014 11:48 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > Hi David, > > Thanks for the comments! > > On 07/30/2014 12:54 AM, David Collins wrote: >> On 07/24/2014 05:45 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: >>> From: Josh Cartwright <jo...@codeaurora.org> >>> >>> The Qualcomm SPMI PMIC chips are components used with the >>> Snapdragon 800 series SoC family. This driver exists >>> largely as a glue mfd component, it exists to be an owner >>> of an SPMI regmap for children devices described in >>> device tree. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <jo...@codeaurora.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarba...@mm-sol.com> >>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 16 +++++++++++ >>> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + >>> drivers/mfd/pm8xxx-spmi.c | 65 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> Would it be possible to rename this driver: qcom-spmi-pmic.c? The driver >> will be supporting several PMICs that do not fit the pm8xxx naming scheme. >> One of which is even specified in the compatible list of this driver >> (pma8084). There is presently downstream support for the following PMICs: >> PM8019, PM8110, PM8226, PM8841, PM8916, PM8941, PM8994, PMA8084, PMD9635, >> PMI8962, and PMI8994 [1]. Four of these do not fit the "PM8XXX" template. > > I haven't strong opinion on the file names. The qcom prefix is the one > which annoying me. If you look at /drivers/mfd the company name prefixes > are very few. > > The *compatible* strings are the important thing here. So If MFD > maintainer is fine with this name I'm fine too.
Lee, are you OK with suggested names qcom-spmi-pmic and qcom-ssbi-pmic? -- regards, Stan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
