On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 02:24:49PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:01:52 -0700
> Zach Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > > > > @@ -515,7 +515,8 @@ static int write_buf(struct file *filp, const 
> > > > > void *buf,
> > > > > u32 len, loff_t *off)
> > > >
> > > > Though this probably wants to be rewritten in terms of kernel_write().
> > > > That'd give an opportunity to get rid of the sctx->send_off and have it
> > > > use f_pos in the filp.
> > > 
> > > Do you mean directly call kernel_write from send_cmd/send_header ?
> > > I guess that loop around vfs_write in write_buf is there for something ...
> > 
> > write_buf() could still exist to iterate over the buffer in the case of
> > partial writes but it doesn't need to muck around with set_fs() and
> > forcing casts.
> > 
> > - z
> 
> Hello Zach,
> 
>       Here's an untested patch which

Try testing it.  It's easy with virtualization and xfstests.

You'll find that sending to a file fails because each individual file
write call that makes up a send starts at offset 0 -- at the start of
the file.

Getting this right means getting the semantics around updating the send
descriptors f_pos right.  It requires having a bit of a think about send
semantics and f_pos update locking.

- z
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to