Am 12.08.2014 16:46, schrieb Vivek Goyal: > Richard and Daniel reported that UML is broken due to changes to resource > traversal functions. Problem is that iomem_resource.child can be null > and new code does not consider that possibility. Old code used a for loop > and that loop will not even execute if p was null. > > Revert back to for() loop logic and bail out if p is null. > > I also moved sibling_only check out of resource_lock. There is no > reason to keep it inside the lock. > > Following is backtrace of the UML crash.
Shall I pickup this patch and route it via my uml tree to Linus? Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/