Em Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 04:58:19PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@kernel.org> wrote: > > Em Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 08:08:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > > > This patch looks dangerous and misleading to me.
> > I took it more from the angle: hey, it fixes a regression, i.e. > > -T/--time somehow became a noop, and also it doesn't change any > > default. > > It also states that you will get misaccounting, why that would > > happen, althought wording could've been better, as mmaps won't be > > "missing", i.e. they will be there as this governs just > > PERF_SAMPLE_TIME, not perf_event_attr.mmap, so it MMAPs may come > > after samples for its maps. > > So, I took it. > > How should we proceed? > I'd be fine with applying the patch and fixing the misleading > changelog. Done: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=8affc2b8c27bfc2d6e70827b746f490b62c44eaa Consider now pulling the perf-core-for-mingo tag there, I updated it after updating the changelog for this specific commit, all the rest is the same as in the previous pull req. Thanks, - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
