Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 06:45:13PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c 
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index 2502d0d..ef6c8b7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -2541,7 +2541,6 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>  
>       case 60: /* Haswell Client */
>       case 70:
> -     case 71:
>       case 63:
>       case 69:
>               x86_pmu.late_ack = true;

Can you properly describe the remaining model numbers? Surely there's a
significant difference between these chips otherwise why give them
difference model numbers.

Looking at the wikipedia page for Haswell I suspect its things like:
Haswell-{DT,MB,H,ULT}. If so can you but the right name with the right
number?

pgpsKBuyc5qfj.pgp
Description: PGP signature