On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 09:09 +0800, Li Shaohua wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 02:08, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 09:33 +0800, Li Shaohua wrote:
> > > The comments in previous quirk said it's required only in PIC mode.
> > ...
> > > I feel we concerned too much. Changing the interrupt line isn't harmful,
> > > right? Linux actually ignored interrupt line. Maybe just a
> > > PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_via_irq) is
> > > sufficient.
> >
> > I think it's good to limit the scope of the quirk as much as
> > possible because that makes it easier to do future restructuring,
> > such as device-specific interrupt routers.
> >
> > The comment (before quirk_via_acpi(), nowhere near quirk_via_irqpic())
> > says *on-chip devices* have this unusual behavior when the interrupt
> > line is written. That makes sense to me.
> >
> > Writing the interrupt line on random plug-in Via PCI devices does
> > not make sense to me, because for that to have any effect, an
> > upstream bridge would have to be snooping the traffic going through
> > it. That doesn't sound plausible to me.
> >
> > What about this:
> Hmm, this looks like previous solution. We removed the specific via
> quirk is because we don't know how many devices have such issue. Every
> time we encounter an IRQ issue in a VIA PCI device, we will suspect it
> requires quirk and keep try. This is a big overhead.
OK. Try this one for size. It differs from what's currently in
the tree in these ways:
- It's a quirk, so we don't have to clutter acpi_pci_irq_enable()
and pirq_enable_irq() with Via-specific code.
- It doesn't do anything unless we're in PIC mode. The comment
suggests this issue only affects PIC routing.
- We do this for ALL Via devices. The current code in the tree
does it for all devices in the system IF there is a Via device
with devfn==0, which misses Grzegorz's case.
Does anybody have a pointer to a spec that talks about this? It'd
be awfully nice to have a reference.
Grzegorz, can you check to make sure this still works after all the
tweaking?
===== arch/i386/pci/irq.c 1.55 vs edited =====
--- 1.55/arch/i386/pci/irq.c 2005-02-07 22:39:15 -07:00
+++ edited/arch/i386/pci/irq.c 2005-03-15 10:11:44 -07:00
@@ -1026,7 +1026,6 @@
static int pirq_enable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
u8 pin;
- extern int via_interrupt_line_quirk;
struct pci_dev *temp_dev;
pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, &pin);
@@ -1081,10 +1080,6 @@
printk(KERN_WARNING "PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin %c of
device %s.%s\n",
'A' + pin, pci_name(dev), msg);
}
- /* VIA bridges use interrupt line for apic/pci steering across
- the V-Link */
- else if (via_interrupt_line_quirk)
- pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, dev->irq & 15);
return 0;
}
===== drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c 1.37 vs edited =====
--- 1.37/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c 2005-03-01 09:57:29 -07:00
+++ edited/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c 2005-03-15 10:10:57 -07:00
@@ -388,7 +388,6 @@
u8 pin = 0;
int edge_level = ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE;
int active_high_low = ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW;
- extern int via_interrupt_line_quirk;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_pci_irq_enable");
@@ -437,9 +436,6 @@
return_VALUE(0);
}
}
-
- if (via_interrupt_line_quirk)
- pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, irq & 15);
dev->irq = acpi_register_gsi(irq, edge_level, active_high_low);
===== drivers/pci/quirks.c 1.72 vs edited =====
--- 1.72/drivers/pci/quirks.c 2005-03-10 01:38:25 -07:00
+++ edited/drivers/pci/quirks.c 2005-03-18 10:55:01 -07:00
@@ -683,19 +683,40 @@
}
DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82454NX,
quirk_disable_pxb );
-/*
- * VIA northbridges care about PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE
- */
-int via_interrupt_line_quirk;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#endif
-static void __devinit quirk_via_bridge(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+static void __devinit quirk_via_irqpic(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
- if(pdev->devfn == 0) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Via IRQ fixup\n");
- via_interrupt_line_quirk = 1;
+ u8 irq, new_irq;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
+ if (skip_ioapic_setup)
+ return;
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+ if (acpi_irq_model != ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PIC)
+ return;
+#endif
+ /*
+ * Some Via devices make an internal connection to the PIC when the
+ * PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE register is written. If we've changed the
+ * device's IRQ, we need to update this routing.
+ *
+ * I suspect this only happens for devices on the same chip as the
+ * PIC, but I don't know how to identify those without listing them
+ * all individually, which is a maintenance problem.
+ */
+ new_irq = dev->irq & 0xf;
+ pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, &irq);
+ if (new_irq != irq) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Via PIC IRQ fixup for %s, from %d to
%d\n",
+ pci_name(dev), irq, new_irq);
+ pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, new_irq);
}
}
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID,
quirk_via_bridge );
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_via_irqpic);
/*
* Serverworks CSB5 IDE does not fully support native mode
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
