Hi Gabi,

I did not review the full patchset but this function caught my attention..

+};
+
+static int miphy28lp_get_ressource_byname(struct device_node *child,
+                                         char *name, struct resource *res)
+{

s/miphy28lp_get_ressource_byname/miphy28lp_get_resource_byname

+       int index, ret = 0, count = 0;
+       int reg_tuple_size;
+       const __be32 *p;
+
+       reg_tuple_size = (of_n_addr_cells(child) +
+                       of_n_size_cells(child)) * sizeof(u32);
+
+       p = of_get_property(child, "reg", &count);
+       if (count % reg_tuple_size != 0)
+               ret = -EINVAL;
+
+       count /= reg_tuple_size;
+
+       for (index = 0; index < count; index++) {
+               const char *rname = NULL;
+
+               ret = of_property_read_string_index(child, "reg-names",
+                                                   index, &rname);
+               if (!strcmp(name, rname))
+                       return of_address_to_resource(child, index, res);
+       }
+
+       return 1;
This function looks bit complicated, can't we just use:

        index = of_property_match_string(np, "reg-names", rname);
        if (index < 0)
                return -ENODEV;

        return of_address_to_resource(child, index, res);



--srini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to