commit 554086d85e "x86_32, entry: Do syscall exit work on badsys (CVE-2014-4508)" introduced a new jump label (sysenter_badsys) but somehow the END statements seem to have gone wrong (at least it feels that way to me). This does not seem to be a fatal problem, but just for the sake of symmetry, change the second syscall_badsys to sysenter_badsys.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.ba...@canonical.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S index 47c410d..4b0e1df 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ END(syscall_badsys) sysenter_badsys: movl $-ENOSYS,%eax jmp sysenter_after_call -END(syscall_badsys) +END(sysenter_badsys) CFI_ENDPROC .macro FIXUP_ESPFIX_STACK -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/