On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 09:00:39 PM Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:45:20AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, August 22, 2014 05:33:21 PM Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > printk replaced with corresponding dev_err and dev_info
> > > fixed one broken user-visible string
> > > multiine comment edited for correct commenting style
> > > asm/uaccess.h replaced with linux/uaccess.h
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <su...@vectorindia.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/acpi/fan.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/fan.c b/drivers/acpi/fan.c
> > > index 8acf53e..7900d55 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/fan.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/fan.c
> > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/module.h>
> > > #include <linux/init.h>
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > > -#include <asm/uaccess.h>
> > > +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > > #include <linux/thermal.h>
> > > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > >
> > > @@ -127,8 +127,9 @@ static const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops
> > > fan_cooling_ops = {
> > > };
> > >
> > > /*
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > - Driver Interface
> > > -
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > */
> > > + * Driver Interface
> > > + *
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > +*/
> > >
> > > static int acpi_fan_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> > > {
> > > @@ -143,7 +144,7 @@ static int acpi_fan_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> > >
> > > result = acpi_bus_update_power(device->handle, NULL);
> > > if (result) {
> > > - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Setting initial power state\n");
> > > + dev_err(&device->dev, PREFIX "Setting initial power state\n");
> >
> > While at it, please define a proper pr_fmt() for this file and get rid of
> > PREFIX
> > too.
> >
> > Otherwise I don't see a compelling reason to apply this.
> >
>
> Hi,
> Since in the patch I am not using any pr_* , so I am unable to understand why
> you are asking for a proper pr_fmt().
Never mind, I was confused somehow, not exactly sure why. Sorry about that.
> I can get rid of the PREFIX . Then should I use pr_* in the patch instead of
> dev_* ?
> My understanding was dev_* is more preffered than pr_*.
> waiting for your suggestion on this.
Well, that really depends on the particular case. It really is better to use
dev_err() here, but then PREFIX with it is not really useful, so please just
drop PREFIX from the new messages.
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
