On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:20:38PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I saw the following kernel warning: > > Cong thanks for finding and tracking this. I was clearly asleep at the > switch when I was testing my fix to the nfs client code :( > > I have applied this patch and will push it to Linus after it has a > little bit to sit in linux-next.
Why does that code wank with one-by-one remove_proc_entry(), BTW? remove_proc_subtree("nfsfs", net->proc_net) will take care of the whole pile just fine, TYVM... While we are it, there's no need to keep ->proc_nfsfs at all - just have it in a local variable in nfs_fs_proc_net_init(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/