On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:07:40PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look. If you have any ideas I'm happy to try another
> approach.

How horrible is the below patch (performance wise). It does pretty much
the same thing except that percpu_rw_semaphore is a lot saner, its
read side performance should be minimal in the absence of writes.

---
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -1573,6 +1573,7 @@ config PERF_EVENTS
        depends on HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
        select ANON_INODES
        select IRQ_WORK
+       select PERCPU_RWSEM
        help
          Enable kernel support for various performance events provided
          by software and hardware.
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mman.h>
 #include <linux/compat.h>
+#include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
 
 #include "internal.h"
 
@@ -3418,12 +3419,14 @@ static void perf_remove_from_owner(struc
        }
 }
 
+static struct percpu_rw_semaphore perf_rwsem;
+
 /*
  * Called when the last reference to the file is gone.
  */
 static void put_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-       struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
+       struct perf_event_context *ctx;
 
        if (!atomic_long_dec_and_test(&event->refcount))
                return;
@@ -3431,6 +3434,9 @@ static void put_event(struct perf_event
        if (!is_kernel_event(event))
                perf_remove_from_owner(event);
 
+       percpu_down_read(&perf_rwsem);
+       ctx = event->ctx;
+
        WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->parent_ctx);
        /*
         * There are two ways this annotation is useful:
@@ -3447,6 +3453,7 @@ static void put_event(struct perf_event
        mutex_lock_nested(&ctx->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
        perf_remove_from_context(event, true);
        mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
+       percpu_up_read(&perf_rwsem);
 
        _free_event(event);
 }
@@ -7534,6 +7541,8 @@ void perf_pmu_migrate_context(struct pmu
        struct perf_event *event, *tmp;
        LIST_HEAD(events);
 
+       percpu_down_write(&perf_rwsem);
+
        src_ctx = &per_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context, src_cpu)->ctx;
        dst_ctx = &per_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context, dst_cpu)->ctx;
 
@@ -7559,6 +7568,8 @@ void perf_pmu_migrate_context(struct pmu
                get_ctx(dst_ctx);
        }
        mutex_unlock(&dst_ctx->mutex);
+
+       percpu_up_write(&perf_rwsem);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_pmu_migrate_context);
 
@@ -8198,6 +8209,7 @@ void __init perf_event_init(void)
 
        idr_init(&pmu_idr);
 
+       percpu_init_rwsem(&perf_rwsem);
        perf_event_init_all_cpus();
        init_srcu_struct(&pmus_srcu);
        perf_pmu_register(&perf_swevent, "software", PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to