Hi Gerry, Rafael, On 2014年09月08日 06:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, August 28, 2014 10:22:29 AM Jiang Liu wrote: >> Now all code in processor_core.c is APIC ID related, so rename it as >> apic_id.c. Later IOAPIC ID related code will be added into apic_id.c. > Actually, I'm not sure about this one. > > Renames like this make it difficult to backport things in general > and kind of break "git blame", so do we have to do that? > > What's wrong with leaving the name as is and adding a comment > about the contents being related to IOAPIC ID?
It will be thankful for not renaming the file into apic_id.c, because apic id is x86 specific, and platform like ARM will also add some code to get cpu hardware id via GICC structure in MADT table in that file, apic id is not a generic name for both x86 and ARM, I prefer to keep it as it is :) Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
