On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 02:45:41PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> sb_edac controls a large number of different PCI functions. Rather
> than registering as a normal PCI driver for all of them, it
> registers for just one so that it gets probed and, at probe time, it
> looks for all the others.
>
> Coincidentally, the device it registers for also contains the SMBUS
> registers, so the PCI core will refuse to probe both sb_edac and a
> future iMC SMBUS driver. The drivers don't actually conflict, so
> just change sb_edac's device table to probe a different device.
>
> An alternative fix would be to merge the two drivers, but sb_edac
> will also refuse to load on non-ECC systems, whereas i2c_imc would
> still be useful without ECC.
>
> The only user-visible change should be that sb_edac appears to bind
> a different device.
>
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.che...@samsung.com>
> Cc: Rui Wang <ruiv.w...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
> ---
> drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> index a2597e9313c6..e3bc2cced580 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static const struct pci_id_table
> pci_dev_descr_ibridge_table[] = {
> * pci_device_id table for which devices we are looking for
> */
> static const struct pci_device_id sbridge_pci_tbl[] = {
> - {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_TA)},
> + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_HA0)},
> {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA0_TA)},
> {0,} /* 0 terminated list. */
> };
Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <a...@redhat.com>
--
Aristeu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
