On 09/08/14 16:01, Mark Charlebois wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Catalin Marinas
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 7 Sep 2014, at 03:30, Mark Charlebois <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2014 16:23:14 [email protected] wrote:
+ * Copyright (C) 2012 Mark Charlebois
+ */
+
+/*
+ * EABI routines
Does EABI specify these function names? I would think that they are
just random libgcc (whatever that is called in clang) functions.
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0043d/IHI0043D_rtabi.pdf
See section 4.3.4 Memory copying, clearing, and setting
What does this document have to do with arm64 (AArch64, A64)? We don’t
need such symbols on arm64. Also, the arm64 kernel links with libgcc (no
immediate need AFAICT but the compiler does not guarantee the intrinsics
would always be generated inline).
[reposting in plain text]
This patch was made early in the arm64 kernel support. I just retested
and you are correct, it is no longer needed. My apologies to all.
Whoops. I normally check whether a patch is still needed before posting
them. I seem to have missed that step this time. My apologies as well.
That all being said, I prefer to see patches no longer required, than
needing them to be upstreamed, so in that this is a win.
Behan
--
Behan Webster
[email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
