On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:08:46AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

SNIP

> +}
> +
> +void fdarray__exit(struct fdarray *fda)
> +{
> +     free(fda->entries);
> +     fdarray__init(fda, 0);
> +}
> +
> +void fdarray__delete(struct fdarray *fda)
> +{
> +     fdarray__exit(fda);
> +     free(fda);
> +}
> +
> +int fdarray__add(struct fdarray *fda, int fd, short revents)
> +{
> +     if (fda->nr == fda->nr_alloc &&
> +         fdarray__grow(fda, fda->nr_autogrow) < 0)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);

also I spot this one and couldn't think of reason for it, attached
patch makes no behaviour difference for me..

I might be missing something, but I dont see any blocking operation
in perf related data reads. The git log history says it was there
since early days.

jirka


---
There's no reason for the current user of this API
to have non blocking fds. Also it should be up to
user to set this, not this object.

Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Corey Ashford <[email protected]>
Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Jean Pihet <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
---
 tools/lib/api/fd/array.c |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c b/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
index 3f6d1a0..0e636c4 100644
--- a/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
+++ b/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ int fdarray__add(struct fdarray *fda, int fd, short revents)
            fdarray__grow(fda, fda->nr_autogrow) < 0)
                return -ENOMEM;
 
-       fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
        fda->entries[fda->nr].fd     = fd;
        fda->entries[fda->nr].events = revents;
        fda->nr++;
-- 
1.7.7.6


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to