Hi, On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 10:39, Jan Kara wrote:
> Actually the patch you atached showed in the end as not covering all > the cases and so Stephen agreed to stay with the first try (attached) > which should cover all known cases (although it's not so nice). Right. The later patch is getting reworked into a proper locking overhaul for the journal_put_journal_head() code. The earlier one (that Jan attached) is the one that's appropriate in the mean time; it covers all of the holes we know about for sure and has proven robust in testing. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
