On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 23:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: [] > > With patch nothing happened indeed. > > > > > > > x86_intel_mid_timer=apbt_only > > > > [ 0.116839] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at > > 0000003a > > [ 0.123803] IP: [<c1071c0e>] setup_irq+0xf/0x4d > > ... > >
w/o patch [ 0.000000] Early APIC setup for system timer0 [ 0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.000000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1393 setup_local_APIC+0x20c/0x2d9() ...and stuck a bit later > > > or > > > x86_intel_mid_timer=lapic_and_apbt > > > > [ 0.116858] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at > > 0000003a > > [ 0.123820] IP: [<c1071c0e>] setup_irq+0xf/0x4d > > ... > > w/o patch [ 0.000000] Early APIC setup for system timer0 [ 0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.000000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1393 setup_local_APIC+0x20c/0x2d9() ...and boots normally > > > > > > on the kernel commandline. But even w/o that patch I doubt that > > > anything post moorestown even has that apbt trainwreck implemented. If > > > I'm right then the commandline option will prevent the thing to boot > > > at all, which is an even better reason to remove that crap > > > alltogether. > > > > See above. > > That was with the patch applied, right? Correct. > What happens if you undo the > patch and add the command line options? See above. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@intel.com> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
