On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 06:14:04PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:31:14PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > This patch introduces a new default FIQ handler that is structured in a > > similar way to the existing ARM exception handler and result in the FIQ > > being handled by C code running on the SVC stack (despite this code run > > in the FIQ handler is subject to severe limitations with respect to > > locking making normal interaction with the kernel impossible). > > > > This default handler allows concepts that on x86 would be handled using > > NMIs to be realized on ARM. > > Okay, lastly... I sent you my version of this change, which contained > the changes I've detailed in the previous three emails, which are absent > from your version. > > However, you've taken on board the "trace" thing to svc_entry, and > renamed it to "call_trace". > > Now if I add this to usr_entry, "call_trace" doesn't make any sense, > nor does the .if/.endif placement because it's not just trace_hardirqs_off > which needs to be disabled there, but also ct_user_exit as well. > > I'm beginning to wonder why I tried to be nice here... it would've been > a lot faster for me to take your patch, make my own changes and commit > that instead. > > Frustrated.
And another thing you're missing are the updates to arch/arm/kernel/fiq.c to ensure that the FIQ registers are preserved when we restore this new default FIQ handler. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/