From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:51:36 +0200

> From: Bo Shen <voice.s...@atmel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.s...@atmel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@atmel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
> index ca5d7798b265..a3b35c146d9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
> @@ -2241,6 +2241,7 @@ static int __init macb_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>  
>       netif_carrier_off(dev);
>  
> +     netdev_info(dev, "Cadence rev 0x%08x\n", macb_readl(bp, MID));
>       netdev_info(dev, "Cadence %s at 0x%08lx irq %d (%pM)\n",
>                   macb_is_gem(bp) ? "GEM" : "MACB", dev->base_addr,
>                   dev->irq, dev->dev_addr);

This is really sloppy.  The "Cadence %s at ..." is what announces the device,
therefore it's out of context to print out the device revision beforehand.

Why don't you just add it to the existing printout instead?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to