On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:21:45 +0100 Rob Jones <rob.jo...@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
> On 12/09/14 22:50, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:09:36 +0100 Rob Jones <rob.jo...@codethink.co.uk> > > wrote: > > > >> fs: proc: use __seq_open_private() > >> fs: proc: use __seq_open_private() > > > > See the problem? We have two different patches, both named the same. > > Always another gotcha! :-) > > Seriously, does it say anywhere that patch names have to be unique? It > makes perfect sense when it's pointed out but it never occurred to me. Not explicitly as far as I know. Documentation/SubmittingPatches implies it. Search for "unique". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
