On 09/15/2014 10:51 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 07:28:24AM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:04PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> See also Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt, pci=noacpi
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>>> index 9252f72..693da7f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>>> @@ -67,3 +67,18 @@ void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
>>> if (acpi_table_init())
>>> disable_acpi();
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!arg)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + /* "acpi=off" disables both ACPI table parsing and interpreter */
>>> + if (strcmp(arg, "off") == 0)
>>> + disable_acpi();
>>> + else
>>> + return -EINVAL; /* Core will print when we return error */
>>
>> For symmetry, you should handle acpi=force here too (i.e. if someone
>> disables by default, which I expect we'll ask for when this code is
>> first merged).
>
> Does this mean you want another Kconfig option - ACPI_DEFAULT_OFF (which
> would be set by default)?
This would make sense. I mentioned this before since it gives distros an
opportunity to set this differently for their shipping preference
without the upstream having to default to being on.
Jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
