On 09/15/2014 06:50 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:47:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:08:57PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>>
>>> perf tools copy VDSO out of memory. However, on 64-bit machines there
>>> may be 32-bit compatibility VDOs also. To copy those requires
>>> separate 32-bit executables. This patch adds to the build additional
>>> programs perf-read-vdso32 and perf-read-vdsox32 for 32-bit and x32
>>> respectively.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
>> <SNIP>
>>> tools/perf/config/feature-checks/test-compile.c | 4 +++
>> <SNIP>
>>> 8 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>> <SNIP>
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/config/feature-checks/test-compile.c
>> <SNIP>
>>
>>
>> In resolving conflicts that happen because I haven't merged some other
>> files (thread_stack, etC) I noticed that this patch introduces something
>> that is explicitely listed in a .gitignore file:
>>
>> [acme@zoo linux]$ git show d316f16dddd8c7780c727bbd507338e4147c9280
>> commit d316f16dddd8c7780c727bbd507338e4147c9280
>> Author: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com>
>> Date: Fri Aug 15 22:08:59 2014 +0300
>>
>> perf tools: Add feature checks to .gitignore
>>
>> <SNIP>
>>
>> +++ b/tools/perf/.gitignore
>> @@ -24,3 +24,4 @@ config.mak.autogen
>> *-flex.*
>> *.pyc
>> *.pyo
>> +config/feature-checks/test-*
>> [acme@zoo linux]$
>>
>>
>> So I think we should use some different name for this test-compile.c
>> file?
The name is ok.
>>
>> I'll leave those two csets out of this pull req, so that you can rebase
>> what is left on top of what is being merged and we can do one more
>> progress step in having all this merged, ok?
>
> Since we can't ignore all test- prefixed files there, I'm removing the
> patch that added it to .gitignore as well:
>
> commit d316f16dddd8c7780c727bbd507338e4147c9280
> Author: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Fri Aug 15 22:08:59 2014 +0300
>
> Aftewards I'll revisit this, because without this .gitignore patch I
> think your patch will be ok.
The .gitignore patch is wrong. I picked it up because Alex had it in
his tree but it must be very old because it was superseded by:
commit 56560ec692c142bb9ee404764e3b67999031ad19
Author: Chunwei Chen <tux...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Dec 21 13:48:11 2013 +0800
perf config: Ignore generated files in feature-checks
1. Rename the test-* binary files to test-*.bin for easier pattern matching
as
suggested by Ingo.
2. Ignore *.bin and *.d files.
Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <tux...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/52b52b9b.50...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
>
> - Arnaldo
>
>> I mean:
>>
>>>> Up-to-date versions can be found from 15 August:
>>>>
>>>> patchwork:
>>>>
>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4729131/
>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4729111/
>>
>>
>> - Arnaldo
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
