On 09/19/2014 11:54 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:52:59AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> I agree. I think Ming wanted to avoid an unnecessary bitflip if >> possible, but the fix is more convoluted than I would like. > > If the requeue from irq context ever ends up in the fast path we > have much worse problems..
Oh yes certainly, my point was purely that I think this is why Mings fix ended up being more involved than it need be. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
