Hey, Op 23-09-14 om 15:18 schreef Matt Fleming: > On Tue, 23 Sep, at 10:18:07AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> It will be difficult for me to keep up with this thread over the next >> days, so I have added Leif and Roy on cc. If you need to make any >> changes that affect arm64, they should be able to confirm whether it >> causes any problems or not. > OK, below is what I've got on top of commit f3670394c29f in Linus' tree. > Please don't anyone pick this up yet, I'm still testing it on my > machines and it desperately needs some Tested-by tags. > > Josh, your machines probably boot fine after the revert from Linus but > it'd be good to verify that this patch doesn't make things any worse. > > Maarten, please verify that your Macbook pro boots with this patch. I > very much want to be able to add a Tested-by from you. > > Ard, Leif, Roy, can you please validate this for arm64? The thing to > look out for is whether the changes to drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile > make sense, and in particular, whether it's ever possible to have > CONFIG_EFI_STUB=y and CONFIG_EFI_ARM_STUB=n. > > If the answer is yes, then this patch might break your build and we > probably want to do something like unconditionally select > CONFIG_EFI_ARM_STUB when CONFIG_EFI_STUB=y. > It seems to boot for me with direct efi netboot. But when I'm doing a local boot through refind instead I also hit that setup_efi_pci() failed bug, it doesn't look like it's fixed by reverting all the efi stub patches though. This might need more bisecting first...
~Maarten -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/