* Matt Fleming <m...@console-pimps.org> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep, at 03:08:16PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Matt Fleming <m...@console-pimps.org> wrote: > > > > > +/* > > > + * There's no way to return an informative status from this function, > > > + * because any analysis (and printing of error messages) needs to be > > > + * done directly at the EFI function call-site. > > > + * > > > + * For example, EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER could indicate a bug or maybe we > > > + * just didn't find any PCI devices, but there's no way to tell outside > > > + * the context of the call. > > > + */ > > > +static void setup_efi_pci(struct boot_params *params) > > > > Btw., do we print proper complaints at the EFI call sites if such > > failures do happen (and if that failure is unexpected/bad)? > > Not yet, but I've got a patch queued up for v3.18 that does this.
Great, thanks! Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/