On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:22:12 -0600 Shuah Khan <shua...@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
> One simple approach is to have the user install the required tools > for the test. Indicate what is needed and fail the test with > appropriate message with xskip. This is what I have in mind for > tests that can't be run because of a missing config. The same can > be extended to external tools that the test depends on. Should I hold off adding my tests until we have all this in place. Or should I just push my tests with simply passing if the config isn't supported for now and add it later? I wont add any of the tests that require other tools besides echo, grep and cat. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
