(2014/09/25 10:14), Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:35:05 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com> wrote: > >> (2014/09/25 0:58), Steven Rostedt wrote: >>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:42:35 -0400 >>> Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: >>> >>>>> I think you'd better use exit_unsupported/exit_xfail to notify >>>>> that the test target is not configured, or expected to fail. >>>> >>> >>> Are these functions defined anywhere? I don't seem them in your v5 >>> patch set, or in selftests anywhere. >> >> Hmm, could you check my 4/4 patch in the series?? >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg730578.html > > Hmm, I somehow missed this. Can you check to make sure my for-next > patches are your latest version. I'll pull in 4/4 tomorrow.
Yeah, I ensured that your for-next patches are the v5. You will be able to cleanly apply 4/4 on it :) Thank you, > > Thanks, > > -- Steve > -- Masami HIRAMATSU Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
