diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 41ead8d..1d2396a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -879,7 +879,10 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
                        KERNEL_PGD_PTRS);

        load_cr3(swapper_pg_dir);
-       __flush_tlb_all();
+       if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 5 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 9)
+               __flush_tlb();
+       else
+               __flush_tlb_all();

So why not make __flush_tlb_all() Quark-quirk-aware and be done
with it, instead of having to validate every single
__flush_tlb_all() user?

Quark breaks the x86 'flush all TLBs' semantics - the way to fix
it is to restore those semantics, not to sprinkle the breakage
all around the code ...

Hi Ingo.

We have made __flush_tlb_all() Quark aware - because the previous patch we applied to arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c

ee1b5b165c0a2f04d2107e634e51f05d0eb107de

+       if (c->x86 == 5 && c->x86_model == 9) {
+               pr_info("Disabling PGE capability bit\n");
+               setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_PGE);
+       }

will cause cpu_has_pge() to be false and then the flush_tlb_all code will take the path we want __flush_tlb not __flush_tlb_global

static inline void __flush_tlb_all(void)
{
        if (cpu_has_pge)
                __flush_tlb_global();
        else
                __flush_tlb();
}

The code in setup_arch runs before the cpu_has_pge bit been clobbered.

The commit you did 02276a3a677d681f0cd227d7111c71fdbce23832 just adds a comment to setup_arch to indicate the behaviour we are relying on

setup_arch()
{

load_cr3(swapper_pg_dir);       /* this will flush the TLB on Quark */
__flush_tlb_all();              /*cpu_has_pge() is true at this point*/

......

/* this is where we latch the cpu cabability bits */
early_cpu_init();
}

--
BOD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to