> > @@ -203,6 +376,17 @@ static int sch_gpio_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >                              pdev->name))
> >             return -EBUSY;
> >
> > +   irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
> > +   sch->irq_support = !!irq;
> > +   if (sch->irq_support) {
> > +           sch->irq_num = irq->start;
> > +           if (sch->irq_num < 0) {
> > +                   dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> > +                            "failed to obtain irq number for device\n");
> > +                   sch->irq_support = 0;
> > +           }
> > +   }
> > +
> >     spin_lock_init(&sch->lock);
> >     sch->iobase = res->start;
> >     sch->chip = sch_gpio_chip;
> > @@ -251,17 +435,72 @@ static int sch_gpio_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >             return -ENODEV;
> >     }
> >
> > +   err = gpiochip_add(&sch->chip);
> > +   if (err < 0)
> > +           goto err_sch_gpio;
> > +
> > +   if (sch->irq_support) {
> > +           sch->irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, sch->chip.ngpio,
> > +                                           NUMA_NO_NODE);
> > +           if (sch->irq_base < 0) {
> > +                   dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > +                           "failed to add GPIO IRQ descs\n");
> > +                   sch->irq_base = -1;
> > +                   goto err_sch_intr_chip;
> > +           }
> 
> Was there some reason why you can't use gpiochip_irqchip_* helpers here?

I will look into the helpers function and see what I can change here.

> 
> > +
> > +           /* disable interrupts */
> > +           sch_gpio_irq_disable_all(sch, sch->chip.ngpio);
> > +
> > +           err = request_irq(sch->irq_num, sch_gpio_irq_handler,
> > +                             IRQF_SHARED, KBUILD_MODNAME, sch);
> 
> This seems weird, typically irqchip drivers don't call request_irq() directly 
> but
> instead irq_set_chained_handler() or similar. With
> gpiochip_irqchip_* stuff you don't need even that.
> 
Regarding this, gpio-sch is actually using shared interrupts and the IRQ 
resources are from ACPI SCI. As per my understanding, resources from ACPI SCI 
might be shared for power management purposes. In this case, 
irq_set_chained_handler() might not be able to use here. What do you think?

Rebecca
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to