On 12/09/14 22:54, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:09:37 +0100 Rob Jones <rob.jo...@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
Reduce boilerplate code by using __seq_open_private() instead of seq_open().
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fs-proc-task_nommuc-change-maps_open-to-use-__seq_open_private.patch
already did this.
This duplicated only half of my submission, patch 2/2 did a similar
operation on a different file (fs/proc/task_mmu.c).
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/12/347
Is that one actually going in (with Andrew's rename to include the file
name) or should I resubmit it on its own?
--
Rob Jones
Codethink Ltd
mailto:rob.jo...@codethink.co.uk
tel:+44 161 236 5575
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
