On 10/02/2014 12:10 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com> wrote: >> > >> > I have a new one for you. I know it doesn't say "numa" anywhere, but I >> > haven't ever seen that trace before so I'll just go ahead and blame it >> > on your patch... > Fair enough, but the oops doesn't really give even a hint of what > could be wrong. > > The stack is clearly too deep: > > Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted > task.ti: ffff880dba2ec000 > RSP: ffff880dba2ebf48 > > but my patch shouldn't have added any deeper call-chains anywhere.
For the record, I tweaked the environment to put some more pressure on the scheduler and found out what broke (which is not related to this thread at all). For the curious ones: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/3/5 Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
