>From 6ae833c7fe0c6ef1f0ab13cc775da230d6f4c256 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:01:52 -0400
When @gfp is specified, the percpu allocator is interested in whether
it contains all of GFP_KERNEL or not. If it does, the normal
allocation path is taken; otherwise, the atomic allocation path.
Unfortunately, pcpu_alloc() was incorrectly testing for whether @gfp
contains any part of GFP_KERNEL.
Fix it by testing "(gfp & GFP_KERNEL) != GFP_KERNEL" instead of
"!(gfp & GFP_KERNEL)" to decide whether the allocation should be
atomic or not.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
---
Oops, noticed this while preparing the pull request for v3.18-rc1.
Applied to percpu/for-3.18.
Thanks.
mm/percpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index e10f9f7..014bab6 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align,
bool reserved,
static int warn_limit = 10;
struct pcpu_chunk *chunk;
const char *err;
- bool is_atomic = !(gfp & GFP_KERNEL);
+ bool is_atomic = (gfp & GFP_KERNEL) != GFP_KERNEL;
int occ_pages = 0;
int slot, off, new_alloc, cpu, ret;
unsigned long flags;
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
