On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:00:20 +0200 Peter Oberparleiter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looks good. Andrew, can you pick this change up via your tree? > Sure. > > On 09.10.2014 12:54, Riku Voipio wrote: > > Following up the arm testing of gcov, turns out gcov on ARM64 > > works fine as well. Only change needed is adding ARM64 to Kconfig > > depends. > > > > Tested with qemu and mach-virt > > > > Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <[email protected]> > > --- > > kernel/gcov/Kconfig | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig > > index cf66c5c..3b74087 100644 > > --- a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig > > +++ b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig > > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ config GCOV_KERNEL > > config GCOV_PROFILE_ALL > > bool "Profile entire Kernel" > > depends on GCOV_KERNEL > > - depends on SUPERH || S390 || X86 || PPC || MICROBLAZE || ARM > > + depends on SUPERH || S390 || X86 || PPC || MICROBLAZE || ARM || ARM64 > > default n > > ---help--- > > This options activates profiling for the entire kernel. gcov is doing this the wrong way. There should be a `select GCOV_PROFILE_ALL' in each arch/*/Kconfig. (But pleeeeeeze not at the end of the list! That's the perfect way of maximizing patch conflicts, but nobody seems to understand this) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
