2014-10-16 0:15 GMT+02:00 Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>: > On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 15:06:17 +0200 Rickard Strandqvist > <rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se> wrote: > >> Added a function strzcpy which works the same as strncpy, >> but guaranteed to produce the trailing null character. >> >> There are many places in the code where strncpy used although it >> must be zero terminated, and switching to strlcpy is not an option >> because the string must nonetheless be fyld with zero characters. > > As I mentioned last time, I think this patch would be better if it came > with follow-on patches which convert at least some of those callsites. > As it stands, this function has no callers and hence it won't get > tested. Plus those follow-on patches will demonstrate the value of > this patch and will provide example usages.
Hi Sure I can do that! I have saved some patches just to be able to use this new feature. But should I submit everything as one patch then? Or is there some kind of dependency thing I can use... I have also e-mailed with Dan about this, he pointed out the same as some of my tests indicate that strzcpy maybe just should use strncpy and add a null character instead because strncpy is optimized depending on the hardware it runs on. What do you think about that? Kind regards Rickard Strandqvist -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/