On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 07:21:27PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> +     if (ecryptfs_file_to_private(file))
> +             lower_file = ecryptfs_file_to_lower(file);
> +
> +     if (!lower_file || !lower_file->f_op)
> +             return rc;

At least a file without f->f_op should never happen.  How could ecryptfs
not have a lower file here?

>
> +
> +     if (lower_file->f_op && lower_file->f_op->fadvise)
> +             rc = lower_file->f_op->fadvise(lower_file, offset, len, advice);
> +     else
> +             rc = generic_fadvise(lower_file, offset, len, advice);

Seems like this should be in a vfs_fadvice helper.

> +     if (!rc)
> +             generic_fadvise(file, offset, len, advice);

Setting the advice on both files seems odd.  Which one do we actually
need them on?

> +     if (lower_file->f_op && lower_file->f_op->set_flags) {
> +             rc = lower_file->f_op->set_flags(lower_file,
> +                                              flags & ECRYPTFS_FL_MASK);
> +             if (rc)
> +                     return rc;
> +     } else
> +             generic_file_set_flags(file, flags & ECRYPTFS_FL_MASK);

Seems like you want a vfs_set_flags again.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to