On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 09:50:57PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 10/20/2014 07:36 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:

> > I guess I was just trying to follow the suggestion that was in the
> > regulator code:
> > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/regulator/core.c#L3699
> > that says "This will usually be called by machine suspend code prior
> > to supending."

> I see, but still I feel as if it may be a lot of duplication since most
> platforms will likely want to call the regulator core suspend prepare

Note that architectures are an example of a platform.  It really depends
what's responsible for final poweroff, we want this called as late as we
possibly can.

> and finish functions. Maybe it can be added as a Kconfig option so each
> platform can choose at the config level if they want those to be called?

No, that's obviously not going to do anything useful for multiplatform.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to