On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> wrote:
> On 10/20/14 17:04, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> --- a/init/main.c
>> +++ b/init/main.c
>> @@ -960,13 +960,8 @@ static int __ref kernel_init(void *unused)
>> ret = run_init_process(execute_command);
>> if (!ret)
>> return 0;
>> -#ifndef CONFIG_INIT_FALLBACK
>> panic("Requested init %s failed (error %d).",
>> execute_command, ret);
>> -#else
>> - pr_err("Failed to execute %s (error %d). Attempting
>> defaults...\n",
>> - execute_command, ret);
>> -#endif
>> }
>> if (!try_to_run_init_process("/sbin/init") ||
>> !try_to_run_init_process("/etc/init") ||
>>
>
> Would you like to remove the try_to_run_init_process() stack of random
> hardwired names that we can never reach if we panic, or do you just want
> to remove the error message?
>
I'm confused. That code is reachable if there's no initramfs and
init= is not specified.
--Andy
> Confused,
>
> Rob
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
