On 10/21/2014 12:44 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Martin Kelly wrote: >> On 10/21/2014 01:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> Thomas, do you see any issues with a revision that separates out the >> return values (0 for a map with 1 entry, -1 for a map with invalid >> entries) and adds checks in the callers, where appropriate? > > I think that's a sane approach. >
Alright, I will work on a new patch doing that, separating out each call site (and relevant error handling) into its own patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
