On 22 October 2014 18:11, Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:06:23AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote: >> @@ -306,10 +324,13 @@ extern void _memset_io(volatile void __iomem *, int, >> size_t); >> __raw_readw(c)); __r; }) >> #define readl_relaxed(c) ({ u32 __r = le32_to_cpu((__force __le32) \ >> __raw_readl(c)); __r; }) >> +#define readq_relaxed(c) ({ u64 __r = le64_to_cpu((__force __le64) \ >> + __raw_readq(c)); __r; }) >> >> #define writeb_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writeb(v,c) >> #define writew_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writew((__force u16) cpu_to_le16(v),c) >> #define writel_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writel((__force u32) cpu_to_le32(v),c) >> +#define writeq_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writeq((__force u64) cpu_to_le64(v),c) > > You should only define these if we have the corresponding __raw_ versions > too.
I had this conversation with a colleague who reviewed the work. If the architecture is < 5 the __raw_ versions aren't included and the compiler won't complain until someone tries to use the macros. We achieve the same result - the macros aren't accessible when the architecture doesn't support it - while saving an #if condition in the file. I'm not strongly opinionated on this - I can enclose the macros in an #if statement. > > -- > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up > according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/