On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, pang.xunlei wrote: > The kernel uses 32-bit signed value(time_t) for seconds since > 1970-01-01:00:00:00, so it > will overflow at 2038-01-19 03:14:08 on 32-bit systems. We call this "2038 > safety" issue.
We really know that by now. No need to repeat that for every patch. > As part of addressing 2038 saftey for in-kernel uses, this patch creates no > functional change > in existing users, and converts rtc_tm_to_time_unsafe() to rtc_tm_to_time() > in rtc_hctosys(). Please line break your changelogs properly. That's how it should look like: > As part of addressing 2038 saftey for in-kernel uses, this patch > creates no functional change in existing users, and converts > rtc_tm_to_time_unsafe() to rtc_tm_to_time() in rtc_hctosys(). Can you spot the difference? > @@ -26,9 +26,10 @@ static int __init rtc_hctosys(void) > { > int err = -ENODEV; > struct rtc_time tm; > - struct timespec tv = { > + struct timespec64 tv = { > .tv_nsec = NSEC_PER_SEC >> 1, > }; > + struct timespec ts32; So this is exactly why I dislike this whole flag day conversion thing. If you add rtc_tm_to_time64() do_settimeofday64() in the first place, you can convert the whole function in one go without introducing intermediate variables which then need to be undone later again. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/